Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Something better to do on a Tuesday afternoon

Ahh... a relaxing cup of tea! That's what I fixed for myself when I came home from a five-day trip (I'm a flight attendant- more on that later) this evening. Little did I know that tea would be on my mind for the rest of the evening, and no, not because of the caffeine content. I'm actually writing about modern-day tea parties.

I received an enthusiastic email from the woman who runs my neighborhood watch two days ago inviting everyone on her mailing list to a Rockford tea Party. Apparently a group of people in Rockford, IL, a place I proudly call home, are planning to organize and dump tea into the Rock River on April 14. The email then included an exciting offer to join an even larger group renting a bus to go dump tea in the Chicago river. All this for only $20! Oh... plus the cost of tea. Needless to say the email filled me with such anger and disgust I decided to take action.


Here is a copy of the invite.
THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT HAS GONE TOO FAR AND TAKEN TOO MUCH. We are Tax Objectors not tax avoiders nor tax cheaters. We pay our Taxes. We pay too much. Taxes must be reduced.. Government waste, fraud and abuse must be reduced. We will be heard on April 14, 2009 at the RockfordTeaParty and make our grievances known not only here in Rockford but also to the United States Government. Our Objections to the American Tax Code will be presented to various leaders peacefully. We are looking for 1000 people who also object. Join the RockfordTeaParty.

So after I vented a little rage I responded to this woman's email. I told her times must be ok if she had enough money to throw tea into the river. I also asked her to please remove me from her mailing list. I want nothing to do with this crackpot group. I would rather have my email inbox flooded with porn, ads, forwards and requests for money by Nigerian kings than this crap. I felt disgusting.

Writing her back wasn't enough to satisfy me. I still felt so sad and appalled. I was beginning to worry that people in Rockford may actually join this group. People from Rockford may actually think they are protesting higher taxes by dumping tea in the Rock River. I went to the city of Rockford website and looked up the ordinances regarding littering. Rockford city ordinance 25 prohibits littering and section c specifically mentions bodies of water. I will post it in a different blog. I forwarded the Rockford Tea Party invite and a copy of the ordinance to the neighborhood watch leader, the mayor, all of my friends and family and the chief of police. In the email I mentioned that hopefully they will be able to get the 1000 people they are trying to get. That would mean up to $100,000 in fines for the city!

I began to feel a little better. I felt like I was taking action but still it was not enough. That's when I decided to start this blog. I think it's important for the other side to be as vocal as the tea dumpers. I find huge fault with the whole tea party protest in general, The protest they are trying to make is nothing like the Boston tea party.
Also, at a time when food pantries are overwhelmed and families are stretching their grocery budgets I think it's inappropriate to waste food for protest. Finally, it bothers me that this group is taking something as near and dear to Rockford as our Rock River and using to showcase their selfish, anti-community, anti-middle-class agenda.

The Boston Tea Party took place December 16, 1773 when officials in Boston refused to return three shiploads of taxed tea to Britain. The colonists were so incensed that they began dumping the tea into the Boston harbor. They were saying that they would rather dump the precious, expensive tea and waste it all rather than pay a tax to someone other than an elected official. This became a movement. It was not necessarily a protest against taxes. It was a protest against taxation without representation. There of course is so much more to the event, but without giving an American revolution lesson I feel that's the relevant info. One could look into the Tea Act of 1767, regarding huge import/export taxes of Tea, an agreement between one of the largest tea companies in the world and the British Parliament and a surplus of black tea with no buyers. To me, the important thing to know here is times were dire. People were paying taxes to a government that was not representing them. They were funding a monarchy.

Our taxes do not fund a monarchy. We just had one of those pesky little elections. You know, the thing that TV focused on instead of Britney Spears for a few months? So first of all, we have direct representation. We hold sovereignty. Second, we don't pay taxes to fund a monarchy or to help some queen's cousin's company stay afloat. We pay taxes because we have decided to have a society and in a society everyone works for a somewhat common goal. You may not want to drive where I want to drive but I bet you want to use roads to get there, right? Taxes pay for roads. You may not want to live in the same kind of house or apartment as me but I bet you want firemen to come save you if it's on fire, right? Taxes pay for firemen. Taxes pay for police. Taxes pay for schools... for maintenance of our infrastructure... for unemployment... for social security... for parks... for West Nile spraying... for pest control... and so on and so forth. With the number of things taxes are spread to cover it's a wonder we haven't paid more from the start.

I'm not for careless spending. I think our taxes should be kept as low as is possible but i also have a profound belief that it's necessary for everyone to contribute to this whole society idea if it is to work. Some are opposed to paying taxes in general. To those people I offer the idea of Haiti. Go to Haiti. No taxes. Of course, there are no roads, barely any homes, massive poverty and starvation and an overall desperate situation, but no taxes for you in Haiti. You can go and live a relatively isolated life and not have mess those pesky sewers or schools or anything.

Others are ok paying taxes but have a problem with where their tax dollars are going. To those people I suggest movement. We have representation here... now.... We can write to our congressmen, our senators, our alderman, the mayor, the governor, the president. If writing doesn't work we can call. If calling doesn't work we can vote for someone who will listen to us. If no such person exists we live in a nation great enough to allow us the chance to run for office ourselves. The options to be heard are endless but they do not begin by violating the law.

That brings me to another reason I am against the whole tea party protest. It is unlawful and unproductive, I know that tea is not in high demand. Homeless shelters may not need it. I volunteer at a homeless shelter and I know we would not really have use for large batches of tea. The greater point for me is that we are cultivating an atmosphere of waste and carelessness. Why dump any food into the river? It also seems contradictory to the argument that people have no money for taxes. You must have a little money if you are dumping it into the river! At least the tea meant something when the colonists did it. They didn't go home and round up a bunch of salt or sugar and bring it to the harbor to dump. The tea was direct from England and dumping it was relevant. Maybe an equivalent would be to dump a Chrysler in the river? I'm not sure on that one.

It upsets me to no end that this group has decided to dump tea into the Rock River. The Rock River is actually the name sake of Rockford. When early settlers came here they had to ford across certain sections of the river and the bottom of it was covered with rocks. That's where Rockford gets its' name. The recreation path along the Rock River is one of my favorite parts of the city. It's close to the historic downtown district and near many of our most beautiful and treasured landmarks. I'm offended that this group has decided to take a symbol of hard work, cooperation and community and use it to aid in their "every man for himself" agenda. When my grandmother's grandparents moved here from Sweden they had to help build the street in front of their home. They did so gladly because they were proud to help build up their own city. They wanted to live in a neighborhood in which they were vested. Using the Rock River, essentially a symbol of community organization and responsibility to make such selfish, individualist points is an insult to everything our town founders help dear.

In closing, I have one thing to say to those who wish to dump tea into the Rock River on April 14th: Bring your tea to me. I will thankfully take it. I love tea. I spend about eight dollars a week on tea and I could use the bailout!

Thanks for reading my blog. I will keep it going because I feel that it is imperative that we do all we can fight for the middle class. The stimulus package is flawed, to be sure, but an anti-community, anti-tax and anti-government mindset will only lead us further into civil unrest and despair. I love my city and my country and I want to make them better, not just for me but for the people around me.

9 comments:

  1. "That brings me to another reason I am against the whole tea party protest. It is unlawful and unproductive,"
    Unlawful???
    What about our constitution? This hateful blog is not about a littering. Do you work as hard stopping the 4th of July firework because of the litter both in the rivers and on the land it leaves behind? It's about wanting censorship of something you don't agree with. You hold up your little law about littering and blow past our constitution which gives you the right to say what you want on this matter.
    I feel sorry for you but will fight and protest to maintain your right to free speech.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The constitution allows free speech. You can participate in your right to free speech without violating any city ordinances. This blog is anything but hateful. I mention many times how I love the city of Rockford. I'm also not trying to prevent in any way your right to protest or your right to free speech. First of all, I can't. Second of all, I won't. I do, however have the right to protest your miseducation of the Boston Tea Party and your misdirected frustration.
    If you feel entitled to break laws to make your point I'm certainly allowed to speak mine.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think Sarah is on the right track here. I do not approve of breaking the law as part of a protest. Sounds like Tea Party did not realize that dumping anything into the Rock River is littering. I am pretty sure the State of Illinois and the EPA have some laws regarding dumping anything into our waterways. Calling your blog hateful shows that he supports your right to free speech as long as you do not disagree with his views. I wonder if he is informing the people that are being recruited for this protest of the possibility of the 100.00 fine. It will be interesting to see if police and public officials allow the littering law to be broken or if they will be there writing tickets.

    ReplyDelete
  4. First time poster, ever. I live in Machesney Park and I unhatefully disagree with the littering angle that you bring up. If you disagree with the protest theme then so be it but don't try to make these people out to be criminals. It's in bad taste. Taxation is a hot subject and if these folks believe they can make a statement with a non-violent act then I say dump away.
    Tony

    ReplyDelete
  5. Graffiti is a non-violent crime. Should we let it slide?
    I am all for their right to protest. Is their argument so weak that they need to violate laws in order to carry their point? No one has proven to me that this is not a violation of city ordinance. In fact, arguers for this protest defend breaking the law to make "the greater point".
    What do you make of the waste issue? Don't you feel that in these times of economic hardship and personal privation we should avoid squandering food and money to make such points? Each day the news is flooded with stories of food pantries struggling to meet demands. How sad that many of our homeless, who tend to hang around the library, will have to sit and watch people dump tea they went out and bought into the river.
    Taxes are indeed a hot button issue. I feel I make other points, besides that of littering,against this protest.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Still a weak argument. I'm sure we can make all kinds of comparisons to other "crimes" that have been overlooked so that someone with your point of view could protest. I understand that you don't agree with the point of view and I see the umpteen points you bring up. I don't agree with them but I understand them. If your so dead against thie "littering" angle then call the cops. You will be certain to end the protest.

    By the way, the next time a starving homeless person is in need of nourishment, I hope they have some tea at the pantry. I'm sure that is exactaly what they need. C'mon Sarah aren't we reaching just a bit?

    Tony

    ReplyDelete
  7. Graffiti is a crime that defaces personal propety. It takes effort and money to remove. I would have to say the comparison is a stretch at best. The waste point is even worse. First and foremost if I want to waste my money on dumping tea then who are you to question that? Secondly, the nutritional value to a homeless person of a tea is minimal at best. Nice try!!

    I read your blog and all your points. I do however disagree with them for the most part. But I'm not political expert and won't be engaging you with argument over that. I doubt I can change your mind and you won't change mine.

    The point I was trying to make was the ineffective argument of criminalizing this protest. If you disagree with the reasonong behind I can respect that. Trying to stop it by criminalizing the issue is what I disagree with. But you're a tax paying citizen as am I and if you feel the need to blow the horn on this then call your local law enforcement to have the protest squashed. I believe that is what your after.

    Respecfully,
    Tony

    ReplyDelete
  8. Tony,
    I can see that you are obviously very passionate in your views and you do share them respectfully. That's why I certainly have no problem posting your comments, which are completely contrary to my opinions. However, I do think it's important to have all the facts and do all the reading if you are going to form an argument against my stance on this issue.
    I have cut and paste this paragraph from the above blog post (Something better to do on a Tuesday afternoon...). I reiterate to you that I volunteer at a homeless shelter. I understand full well that they do not need tea. This is beside my point and I ask you to think a little more abstractly in reference to this issue. Surely this can be done if we are to make the subtle, irrelevant link protesters are trying to have us make to the Boston Tea Party.

    "That brings me to another reason I am against the whole tea party protest. It is unlawful and unproductive, I know that tea is not in high demand. Homeless shelters may not need it. I volunteer at a homeless shelter and I know we would not really have use for large batches of tea. The greater point for me is that we are cultivating an atmosphere of waste and carelessness. Why dump any food into the river? It also seems contradictory to the argument that people have no money for taxes. You must have a little money if you are dumping it into the river! At least the tea meant something when the colonists did it."

    Thank you for your comments. It's important that we all actually do engage in these arguments. That's how we learn from one another.

    I ask you, sir, to teach me then. How do you feel the Boston Tea Party is relevant to the current stimulus act?

    You seem to think graffiti is only an issue as it pertains to personal property. What about public property? I mentioned graffiti in response your calling the protest a "non-violent act". Graffiti, while a blight on society, is not a violent act.

    I submit to you that I was merely pointing out the law. (Rockford City Ordinance 25) I don't wish to make these people seem like hardened criminals. I don't feel they are, honestly. I simply think the law is clear on the issue and they are clear on their intent to break it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Sarah,
    Thanks for posting my comments. We do fundamentally disagree and that is good.

    I'll try to make my point once again. The protestors believe they are being unfairly taxed and the goverment is spending way to much of our money. I tend to agree with those points. You on the otherhand do not believe that to be true. I can see that by the points you have made in your blog. I'm fine with that. We are all different. What I'm trying to say is that using the arguement that the acts of protest are illegal, wasteful, or pertainence to the original tea party does not address the central issues at hand. Bottom line is do you believe the taxation and spending of our goverment is out of control?

    Tony

    ReplyDelete